Be with Me 4Ever..As My Truth!


O Lord !...
You Always say That "I am The Truth!"
"Be With Truth"...Means ......
"You are With ME"!
So.... I always...always.....
Speak the Thruth....Hear the Truth!
Eat,Drink & Swallow..Only the Truth!
I Wakeup with Truth..Walk with the Truth!
I Sleep with theTruth..Sing with the Truth!
I Breath the Truth..I Digest Only the Truth!
And..I Always..Feel that....!!
O Lord!... You Are The Truth..You Are My Truth!
But Hay! ....
Not Everybody Likes "My Truth"..?
Some People Played game around "My Truth" !
They make fun on "My Truth"!...On You..
I Felt that they tried to put Me & You Down!
O Lord ! It's hurt a lot...lot, lot....lot, lot, lot....!..
So Once I Just decided .........
..... To live without The Truth...Without YOU..!
And..O Lord..! I Started To Feel..Like...
.........A Dummy & Gloomy...
............Sweaty & Restless...
O Lord...! I Felt totaly Helpless & Breathless!...
But.....Very next Moment.........
I have seen You with in Me!
With Love & Tears in your Eyes!
With Light & Cheers on your Face!
With Winky Looks & Smile...............
You Hug Me & Speak with Soft & Sweet Love..
"Dear...Don't Go Away from Me...PLZ.............!
I Love You with all Your Innocent TRUTH!
TRUTH is Only "Healthy food 4Life!
TRUTH always leads towards The True Life!
TRUTH has Power To Win Untruth..!
TRUTH brings Divine Happiness Around YOU!
TRUTH love BalRangVeerangUmangHreedy like You!
I M WITHIN YOU AS YOUR TRUTH!"
And... O Lord ! I Felt Like I Got My Breath Back with You!
. I decided To Live with..."MY TRUTH"! with..You!
And I am Living Wonderful Divine Life with MyTRUTH! with You!
O Lord..O Truth! I am always With You..4ever..!

A Brief History of Gilgit

This is a rather self-contained excerpt from my two part article in The Statesman of June 4-5 2006 titled “Pakistan’s Allies”. “Jammu & Kashmir and especially Gilgit Baltistan adjoins the Pashtun regions whose capital has been Peshawar. In August November 1947, a British coup d’etat against J&K State secured Gilgit Baltistan for the new British Dominion of Pakistan. The Treaty of Amritsar had nowhere required Gulab Singh’s dynasty to accept British political control in J&K as came to be exercised by British “Residents” in all other Indian “Native States”. Despite this, Delhi throughout the late 19th Century relentlessly pressed Gulab Singh’s successors Ranbir Singh and Partab Singh to accept political control. The Dogras acquiesced eventually. Delhi’s desire for control had less to do with the welfare of J&K’s people than with protection of increasing British interests in the area, like European migration to Srinagar Valley and guarding against Russian or German moves in Afghanistan.
“Sargin” or “Sargin Gilit”, later corrupted by the Sikhs and Dogras into “Gilgit”, had an ancient people who spoke an archaic Dardic language “intermediate between the Iranian and the Sanskritic”. “The Dards were located by Ptolemy with surprising accuracy on the West of the Upper Indus, beyond the headwaters of the Swat River (Greek: Soastus) and north of the Gandarae (i.e. Kandahar), who occupied Peshawar and the country north of it. This region was traversed by two Chinese pilgrims, Fa Hsien, coming from the north about AD 400 and Hsuan Tsiang, ascending from Swat in AD 629, and both left records of their journeys.” Gilgit had been historically ruled by a Hindu dynasty called Trakane; when they became extinct, Gilgit Valley “was desolated by successive invasions of neighbouring rulers, and in the 20 or 30 years ending with 1842 there had been five dynastic revolutions. The Sikhs entered Gilgit about 1842 and kept a garrison there.” When J&K came under Gulab Singh, “the Gilgit claims were transferred with it, and a boundary commission was sent” by the British. In 1852 the Dogras were driven out with 2,000 dead. In 1860 under Ranbir Singh, the Dogras “returned to Gilgit and took Yasin twice, but did not hold it. They also in 1866 invaded Darel, one of the most secluded Dard states, to the south of the Gilgit basin but withdrew again.”
The British appointed a Political Agent in Gilgit in 1877 but he was withdrawn in 1881. “In 1889, in order to guard against the advance of Russia, the British Government, acting as the suzerain power of Kashmir, established the Gilgit Agency”. The Agency was re-established under control of the British Resident in Jammu & Kashmir. “It comprised the Gilgit Wazarat; the State of Hunza and Nagar; the Punial Jagir; the Governorships of Yasin, Kuh Ghizr and Ishkoman, and Chilas”. In 1935, the British demanded J&K lease to them for 60 years Gilgit town plus most of the Gilgit Agency and the hill states Hunza, Nagar, Yasin and Ishkuman. Hari Singh had no choice but to acquiesce. The leased region was then treated as part of British India, administered by a Political Agent at Gilgit responsible to Delhi, first through the Resident in J& K and later a British Agent in Peshawar. J& K State no longer kept troops in Gilgit and a mercenary force, the Gilgit Scouts, was recruited with British officers and paid for by Delhi. In April 1947, Delhi decided to formally retrocede the leased areas to Hari Singh’s J& K State as of 15 August 1947. The transfer was to formally take place on 1 August. On 31 July, Hari Singh’s Governor arrived to find “all the officers of the British Government had opted for service in Pakistan”. The Gilgit Scouts’ commander, a Major William Brown aged 25, and his adjutant, a Captain Mathieson, planned openly to engineer a coup détat against Hari Singh’s Government. Between August and October, Gilgit was in uneasy calm. At midnight on 31 October 1947, the Governor was surrounded by the Scouts and the next day he was “arrested” and a provisional government declared. Hari Singh’s nearest forces were at Bunji, 34 miles from Gilgit, a few miles downstream from where the Indus is joined by Gilgit River. The 6th J& K Infantry Battalion there was a mixed Sikh Muslim unit, typical of the State’s Army, commanded by a Lt Col. Majid Khan. Bunji controlled the road to Srinagar. Further upstream was Skardu, capital of Baltistan, part of Laddakh District where there was a small garrison. Following Brown’s coup in Gilgit, Muslim soldiers of the 6th Infantry massacred their Sikh brothers at arms at Bunji. The few Sikhs who survived escaped to the hills and from there found their way to the garrison at Skardu. On 4 November 1947, Brown raised the new Pakistani flag in the Scouts’ lines, and by the third week of November a Political Agent from Pakistan had established himself at Gilgit. Brown had engineered Gilgit and its adjoining states to first secede from J&K, and, after some talk of being independent, had promptly acceded to Pakistan. His commander in Peshawar, a Col. Bacon, as well as Col. Iskander Mirza, Defence Secretary in the new Pakistan and later to lead the first military coup détat and become President of Pakistan, were pleased enough. In July 1948, Brown was awarded an MBE (Military) and the British Governor of the NWFP got him a civilian job with ICI which however sent him to Calcutta, where he came to be attacked and left for dead on the streets by Sikhs avenging the Bunji massacre. Brown survived, returned to England, started a riding school, and died in 1984. In March 1994, Pakistan awarded his widow the Sitara IPakistan in recognition of his coup détat.
Gilgit’s ordinary people had not participated in Brown’s coup which carried their fortunes into the new Pakistan, and to this day appear to remain without legislative representation. It was merely assumed that since they were mostly Muslim in number they would wish to be part of Pakistan which also became Liaquat Ali Khan’s assumption about J&K State as a whole in his 1950 statements in North America. What the Gilgit case demonstrates is that J&K State’s descent into a legal condition of ownerless anarchy open to “Military Decision” had begun even before the Pakistani invasion of 22 October 1947 (viz. “Solving Kashmir”, The Statesman, 1-3 December 2005). Also, whatever else the British said or did with respect to J & K, they were closely allied to the new Pakistan on the matter of Gilgit.”


    Beautiful Places

    Beautiful Places (Photo)
    Beautiful Places (Photo)
    Beautiful Places (Photo)

    Tangent Galvanometer

    The tangent galvanometer was first described in an 1837 paper by Claude-Servais-Mathias Pouillet (1790-1868), who later employed this sensitive form of galvanometer to verify Ohm's law. To use the galvanometer, it is first set up on a level surface and the coil aligned with the magnetic north south direction. This means that the compass needle at the middle of the coil is parallel with the plane of the coil when it carries no current. The current to be measured is now sent through the coil, and produces a magnetic field, perpendicular to the plane of the coil, and directly proportional to the current
    one arrives at the total current. The DC voltmeter , which can measure direct voltage, consists of a calibrated galvanometer connected in series with a high resistance. To measure the voltage between two points, one connects the voltmeter between them. The current through the galvanometer (and hence the pointer reading) is then proportional to the voltage.

    Ammeter shunts

    An ammeter shunt is a special type of current-sensing resistor, having four terminals and a value in milliohms or even micro ohms. Current measuring instruments, by themselves, can usually accept only limited currents. To measure high currents, the current passes through the shunt, where the voltage drop is measured and interpreted as current.
     
    A typical shunt consists of two solid metal blocks, sometimes brass, mounted on to an insulating base. Between the blocks, and soldered or brazed to them, are one or more strips of low temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) manganin alloy. Large bolts threaded into the blocks make the current connections, while much-smaller screws provide voltage connections. Shunts are rated by full scale current, and often have a voltage drop of 50 mV at rated current. Such meters are adapted to the shunt full current rating by using an appropriately marked dial face; no change need be made to the other parts of the meter.s) which is relevent in the practical manufacturing of circuits using them. An ammeter is used in series to measure the current flow in a particular circuit.  It must provide a path for the entire current.  It would be difficult to develop a meter that would handle significant amounts of current.  With that in mind, the ammeter uses a shunt to allow some of the current to travel through a course parallel to the meter.  If the shunt malfunctions, it is likely the meter will not be able to handle the current.